Compare

VEQT and the rest.

Six side-by-sides against the funds people ask about most. We only name a winner when the numbers back it up.

Compare VEQT with
Side by side

VEQT and XEQT, side by side

Measure
VEQT
Vanguard · since Jan 2019 · $15.7B
XEQT
iShares · since Aug 2019 · $19.8B
Edge
Yearly fee
The MER. On $10,000: $22 vs $20 a year.
0.22%
0.20%
XEQT
Companies held
More means broader.
13,743
8,475
VEQT
Canada share
Neither better nor worse. A matter of taste.
29.6%
25%
No winner
Past year
Past results only.
+19.1%
+18.9%
Tie
$10k, same window
Since Aug 2019, when both existed.
$26,875
$26,846
Tie
Typical day
Smaller means a calmer ride.
±0.65%
±0.64%
Tie
Payouts
How often cash is paid out.
Once a year
Every quarter
No winner

Where the money goes

Very similar mixes. VEQT holds a little more Canada.

VEQT
XEQT
Growth, head to head

$10,000 in each, since Aug 2019.

Almost the same result. The difference is noise.

Drag across the chart to compare any date.

VEQT
$26,875
XEQT
$26,846

Only the stretch both funds existed. Payouts reinvested. Past results only.

Our take

Near-twins. Pick one and stop switching.

Both hold the world, cost about the same and rebalance themselves. Over 20 years most people would never notice the difference. The real one is who you’re handing your money to: Vanguard is owned by its fund investors, BlackRock by public shareholders.

What we’d do

Already hold one? Keep it. Choosing fresh: VEQT if Vanguard’s investor-owned setup and a little more Canada appeal to you, XEQT if you like its slightly bigger international slice, or whichever your brokerage makes easier to buy. Either is a good choice.

Point by point

Tally: VEQT 2XEQT 2Tie 2

  1. CostBoth charge a 0.17% management fee since the late-2025 cuts. The full MERs, 0.22% and 0.20%, are too close to matter.Winner: Tie
  2. Canadian shareVEQT holds more Canada (29.6% against 25%), which can mean a small dividend tax credit in a taxable account.Winner: VEQT
  3. InternationalXEQT has more outside North America: 30% against 25%.Winner: XEQT
  4. SizeXEQT is bigger ($19.8B against $15.7B). Both trade easily with tight spreads.Winner: XEQT
  5. SimplicityBoth are one-fund portfolios that rebalance themselves. Buy either, keep adding, and ignore the noise.Winner: Tie
  6. Who owns the companyVanguard is owned by its funds’ investors, so there’s no outside owner taking a cut.Winner: VEQT

Our opinion, built on public fund data we update every quarter. Not financial advice; your situation may differ.

What the fee gap costs

Small fees, long time.

Same money, same growth, different fee. Move the sliders to see how much the gap adds up to. Assumes 6% a year before fees.

The gap after 25 years
$1,930

More in your pocket with XEQT. Real, but small next to picking a fund you’ll actually keep.

VEQT · 0.22%
$407,464
XEQT · 0.20%
$409,394
More matchups

Five more, same math.

The figure on each row is VEQT’s lead in growth, in points, since both funds existed.

Request a comparison
Questions

Asked a lot.

Not investment advice.

  • Both are all-stock, worldwide funds for long-term Canadian investors. The differences are the provider (Vanguard or iShares) and the mix: XEQT holds less Canada, 25% against 29.6%. Both charge a 0.17% management fee since the late-2025 cuts, and they’ve performed very similarly.

  • A lower fee means you keep more, all else equal. But a 0.02% gap, like the one between VEQT and XEQT, is about $20 a year on $100,000. Don’t let a tiny fee gap be the only reason you choose.

  • Smaller funds can have slightly wider trading spreads. ZEQT holds about $591M against VEQT’s $15.7B. For most people buying and holding with market orders during the day, the difference is negligible.

  • It depends on how you handle drops. VEQT is all stocks: more growth, bigger swings. VGRO adds 20% bonds for a smoother ride. Neither is better for everyone.

  • VFV holds only the 500 largest U.S. companies. It has no Canadian, international or emerging-market stocks. It’s a great fund, but it’s one market.

  • Both cover the global stock market. VEQT weights by company size. CAGE leans toward smaller, cheaper and more profitable companies. CAGE costs more: 0.28% against 0.22%.

  • Sort of. It doesn’t pick stocks on opinion, but it does follow rules that tilt away from the plain market. Think factor investing rather than stock picking.

  • Only if you really believe in the size and value premiums. They’ve paid off over long periods, but they’ve also vanished for ten years or more, most recently from 2010 to 2020. If you’d sell CAGE during a long stretch of lagging the index, you’d do worse than holding VEQT.

  • Yes. Some people use VEQT as a core and add CAGE on the side. Just know a 50/50 split dilutes the tilt and raises your overall fee.

  • The U.S. has had a historic run. It hasn’t always been this way: from 2000 to 2009 the S&P 500 went roughly nowhere while other markets grew. VEQT covers you if the U.S. doesn’t lead forever.

  • VFV costs 0.09% against VEQT’s 0.22%. On $100,000 that’s about $130 a year. Real, but small next to the bigger question: one market or the whole world.

  • Partly. S&P 500 companies earn about 40% of their revenue abroad, but their shares still move with the U.S. market, U.S. rules and U.S. interest rates. Owning companies listed around the world, as VEQT does, spreads both.

  • Common, but it’s a deliberate bet on more U.S. VEQT already holds about 45% U.S. A small VFV side position is fine if you mean to make that bet.

  • You’d be doubling up. VUN is one of VEQT’s building blocks, about 45% of the fund, so VEQT already owns it. Adding more only raises your U.S. share. That’s fine if it’s a bet you mean to make.

Stop comparing.

The differences are small because the products are good. Pick one, automate it, and close the tab.